------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-08 10:36 ------- Confirmed.
{ struct foo x = {.mem1=0, .mem2=-1}; <<cleanup_point struct foo x = {.mem1=0, .mem2=-1};>>; <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt bar (x.mem2 == (TARGET_EXPR <D.2011, {}>).mem2) >>> >>; return <retval> = 0; } 2.95 used zero for .mem2 initialization. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Known to fail| |3.3.6 4.1.2 4.2.0 Known to work| |2.95.4 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-06-08 10:36:51 date| | Summary|wrong POD type |[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] |initialization with pointer |wrong POD type |to member |initialization with pointer | |to member http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32245