------- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-06-20 08:55 -------
backtrace:

(gdb) bt
#0  fancy_abort (file=0x8a02980 "../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/fold-const.c",
line=12775, function=0x8a021be "fold_checksum_tree") at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:656
#1  0x08207fc1 in fold_checksum_tree (expr=0xb7f55de4, ctx=0xbfab4df0,
ht=0x92ce1e8) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/fold-const.c:12775
#2  0x082077bf in fold_checksum_tree (expr=0xb7f5b138, ctx=0xbfab4df0,
ht=0x92ce1e8) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/fold-const.c:12779
#3  0x0823b69e in fold_build1_stat (code=NOP_EXPR, type=0xb7eb5360,
op0=0xb7f5b138) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/fold-const.c:12892
#4  0x0823b9f7 in fold_convert (type=0xb7eb5360, arg=0xb7f5b138) at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/fold-const.c:2281
#5  0x0894307c in chrec_convert_1 (type=0xb7eb5360, chrec=0xb7f5b138,
at_stmt=0xb7f55e00, use_overflow_semantics=1 '\001') at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/tree-chrec.c:1308
#6  0x0842482b in interpret_rhs_modify_stmt (loop=0xb7f57c38,
at_stmt=0xb7f55e00, opnd1=0xb7f4e1a0, type=0xb7eb5360) at 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32024

Reply via email to