------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 13:15 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Dump a valid program which contains equivalence to show a harder case for the > checks (NAG f95 chokes on it). Actually this is wrong according to the Section 16.5.6 of the F2003 standard: "When a variable of a given type becomes defined, all associated variables of different type become undefined." There then follows an exception that allows REAL and COMPLEX to be equivalenced and not be undefined in this circumstance. Thus one should check for this as well (but having a note in the documentation for this case would make sense too.)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589
