------- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 11:43 -------
The problem of the cyclic definition is (more or less), the same described in
PR24886, isn't it? E.g. replace
implicit character(len(ouch)) (x)
implicit character(len(x)+1) (y)
intent(in) x,y
by
character(len=*), intent(in) :: x ! or character(len=n), n integer
character(len=len(x)+1), intent(in) :: y
to get a working binary. My meaning: "len(ouch)" is not known when defining the
length of the dummy argument x, thus it is a length that's different from the
actual length.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
OtherBugsDependingO| |19276
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31306
