------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 20:26 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > there probably is a case for allowing certain such typedefs to be treated > like keywords with regard to adding _Complex, signed or unsigned.
I second that. Can a decision be reached on whether or not this is a bug, so that we can work on libgfortran accordingly? (for us, being able to use _Complex __float128 would really be a lot simpler) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32187
