------- Comment #6 from dougkwan at google dot com 2007-07-12 06:17 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Missing byte swap optimizations
I misread one of the earlier comments when I typed the reply. So I thought it was reported on the m68k first. I agree that adding test cases is a good idea, I will update & re-submit a new patch, this week. -Doug 12 Jul 2007 06:08:50 -0000, ubizjak at gmail dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ------- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-12 06:08 ------- > (In reply to comment #4) > > > bootstrap to be done). The problem was reported on m68k initially but I > > checked > > FWIW, the problem was reported on i686-pc-linux-gnu, but it is generic RTL > missed-optimization problem. > > BTW: It would be nice if a testcase (or two) were added to the patch. The > added > functionality of the patch is complex enough that we should check it... > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29749 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29749