------- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 07:27 ------- > BTW, if you revert a patch, you should add the testcase that is the reason > it. To avoid regressing again if the patch gets re-applied. Similarly, you > should xfail the other testcase that now fails.
Joost, good point. I thought about XFAIL, but then again, probably nobody will notice that there's something wrong since it's expected to fail. Hence I concluded that it would be preferable to have people asking about a testsuite failure twice a day then to hide the problem it in an xfail :) However, if Paul does find the time today, I'm positive that he will set it right -- otherwise I will implement your suggestion tomorrow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
