------- Comment #3 from fpbeekhof at gmail dot com 2007-08-14 08:11 ------- Subject: Re: std::tr1::tgamma produces wrong results [for (x-1) in stead of for x]
OOPS! Thank you! And sorry for wasting your time... pcarlini at suse dot de wrote: > ------- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-13 17:00 ------- > (In reply to comment #0) >> The implementation of std::tr1::tgamma looks wrong to me. >> >> Keep in mind that the gamma function is equal to the factorial function for >> integer values. > > Now I see: this statement is incorrect, and that's why we don't have an issue. > The real relationship is: > > gamma(m) == (m - 1)! > > As you can check here, for example: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GammaFunction.html > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33060
