------- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 08:14 ------- Rejecting "operator(.procedure.)" has been fixed by PR33072. Accepting multiple renames/imports of an operator ("operator(.op.), operator(.myop.)=>operator(.op.)") is fixed by the submitted patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01081.html
Remains to be done: Supporting "operator(+)=>operator(.myPlusOp.)", which can be based on the attachment 13369 and the submitted patch. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|wrong-code |rejects-valid Summary|Uninitialized variable in |F2003: use mod, operator(+) |f951 (in read_module) / |=> operator(.userOp.) not |renaming operator in USE |supported Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298