------- Comment #11 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2007-08-17 17:25 -------
Subject: Re: wrong error recovery on parsing template arguments
Seems impractical. I don't have access to the old versions or mainline,
and don't know what magic to put in the source for your system to use.
I'm sure all that could be fixed, but it's more likely to take more of
someone's time holding my hand than it would be to do it themselves. If
I were doing a hundred of them it would be worth the investment, but for
a one-off it seems hardly useful.
Ivan
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 10:50 -------
> (In reply to comment #9)
>
>> Subject: Re: wrong error recovery on parsing template arguments
>>
>> Begging your pardon, but what's wrong with the one I put in already?
>>
>>
>
> Nothing is wrong, but to be useful for GCC testsuite, we need to add some
> markers (for example, // { dg-error "template argument 1 is invalid" }) and
> then run an old version and check that the test fails and run it for mainline
> and check that the test passes. Then the patch adding the testcase is
> submitted
> to gcc-patches for review with an appropriate changelog, approved and
> committed. I think it would be a feasible contribution from you, letting more
> advance developers like Paolo to focus on more complex stuff.
>
> But if you don't want to do it just say so, no problem at all.
>
>
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190
