------- Comment #2 from alduc1 at free dot fr 2007-08-30 15:22 ------- I do not think it is the same bug 11751.
For example: *p++ = *p + 1.0; *p++ = *p + 1.0; works. But *p++ = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5); *p++ = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5); does not work (with float). It is not only the ++ operator that cause the problem. Why when it is compiled with gcc 3.2.3 there is no problem ? Why the equivalent code *p = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5); p++; *p = (float) floor((double) *p + 0.5); p++; works ? I do not understand "no sequence point between *p++ and *p" ? -- alduc1 at free dot fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33248