------- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-05 19:19 
-------
Created an attachment (id=14159)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14159&action=view)
Proposed patch

Sorry for the breakage.  Could you try the attached patch?  It seems to
fix the problem on a cross compiler.  I think it's the right fix because

  (a) the rest of expand_binop_directly is careful to pass unmodified operands
      when the expander does not specify a mode, and

  (b) that's what we'd do when not optimising.


-- 

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33306

Reply via email to