------- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 19:19 ------- Created an attachment (id=14159) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14159&action=view) Proposed patch
Sorry for the breakage. Could you try the attached patch? It seems to fix the problem on a cross compiler. I think it's the right fix because (a) the rest of expand_binop_directly is careful to pass unmodified operands when the expander does not specify a mode, and (b) that's what we'd do when not optimising. -- rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33306