------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-12 09:18 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I don't know about "most likely." sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*) is still pretty > common, so my guess would be that the warning is more often wrong than not.
Common on ILP32 targets but since this was reported for LP64 target anyways, what is the difference. Remember sizeof(int) might be equal to sizeof(void*) on most targets but it does not have to. In fact this warning is for portability reasons (though in this case is also correctness). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33403
