------- Comment #15 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-14 13:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=14208) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14208&action=view) Updated patch
(In reply to comment #13) > /home/hp/combe/combined/libgfortran/io/unix.c:1794: error: static declaration > of 'access' follows non-static declaration > /home/hp/combe/combined/newlib/libc/include/sys/unistd.h:19: error: previous > declaration of 'access' was here Oh, you have a prototype for access() in standard headers but no function in the libc? That's weird! Embedded targets will always surprise me. > Besides the obvious s/amod/amode/ typo Hum, how did that even get past my testing? I thought I had commented out HAVE_ACCESS on my x86_64-linux. > maybe use a different name for the internal function Yup, you're right (the second version). I'm attaching an updated patch that should do the same thing you did. (In reply to comment #12) > Testing on v850-unknown-elf suggests that getcwd() is also needed by > libgfortran. Also fixed in the attached new patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21185
