------- Comment #3 from martinezfive at comcast dot net 2007-09-24 13:59 ------- I spoke with the people at EDG and they have confirmed their compiler's acceptance of the code indeed constitutes a bug. Since almost every last EDG developer is also a member of the ISO C++ Core Committee (and vice versa), I feel pretty sure EDG, ICC, and GCC are wrong.
Remember, compilation does not guarantee code is correct; it only guarantees something happened. So, if you can find the point in the Standard which makes the sample code well formed, I'd love to know about it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33409
