------- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-11 01:26 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)
> Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between > 128587 and 128594 in September. The only patch of significance in this > period is Jason's 128590. It's not obvious to me why this would have > affected the behavior of -pedantic. I should get my eyes checked ;( The test has been failing since introduction in r128500. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700