------- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-11 
01:26 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

> Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between
> 128587 and 128594 in September.  The only patch of significance in this
> period is Jason's 128590.  It's not obvious to me why this would have
> affected the behavior of -pedantic.

I should get my eyes checked ;(  The test has been failing since
introduction in r128500.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

Reply via email to