------- Comment #6 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2007-10-31 11:22 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Uh, the VEC_* stuff used there looks like a mess. It's not clear who > allocates > and what the size should be.
I'll take a look and fix if necessary. > For example vect_get_vec_defs_for_stmt_copy > doesn't allocate the VECs which is exactly what causes the problem here. vect_get_vec_defs_for_stmt_copy is not called here, it is used to create vector copies in case of multiple types in the loop. It should reuse the VEC used for the first copy. I think, there is indeed a problem here. We should overwrite the existing entries and not push the new ones. I'll look into this. > > Reducing. > Thanks, Ira -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33953
