------- Comment #5 from sparc64 at rediffmail dot com 2007-11-17 11:50 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > This is invalid as there are no computed gotos in your example so the compiler > does not know it is a target for a goto so it is able to move the label > around.
I dont understand why this bug is invalid. When I use "&&label", I intend to load the address where I point to in my code -- not where the compiler wants to move it around. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28581