------- Comment #10 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2007-11-28 20:08 ------- Subject: Re: Expressions of parameters evaluated with too high precision
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:23:57PM -0000, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > To sum up my point of view: -fno-range-check is about accepting code which is, > strictly speaking, invalid. It is thus an extension and we should be guided by > a) what other compilers do, b) consistency, c) least surprise. Moreover, I > don't think changing that behaviour would hurt maintainability much (but I > might be wrong; we'll know when someone starts working on it). > I have a patch that does what people seem to want. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34230