------- Comment #18 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-30 14:58 ------- It would be -fno-forward-propagate, but what I meant is that the changes *connected to* fwprop could be the culprit. One has to look at dumps to understand if this is the case.
It would be possible, maybe, to put an asm around the problematic basic block, so that one could plot the number of instructions in that basic block over time? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928
