------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 10:52 ------- I don't think this qualifies as a 4.3 regression - http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/CINT/sb-haydn-head-64-32o-32bit/index.html shows that while there were jumps, the numbers close to the 4.2 release are actually quite similar to what we have now. So, unless somebody produces numbers with 4.2 or earlier, this is not a 'regression', but a missed-optimization only.
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Component|target |tree-optimization Keywords| |missed-optimization Summary|[4.3 regression] non-optimal|non-optimal inlining |inlining heuristics |heuristics pessimizes gzip |pessimizes gzip SPEC score |SPEC score at -O3 |at -O3 | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33761