------- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-12-10 21:08 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
... Again, as I expected, 4.3.0 behaves differently, never sets
> eofbit on underflow.

I meant failbit of course.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34423

Reply via email to