------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 05:38 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> 2.95 wrongly accepts this code, but doesn't ICE. So not a regression
> IMHO.
No it is a regression as anything (besides another ICE) to ICE is considered a
regression. I remember we put these rules somewhere.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|ICE with explicit copy |[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE
|constructor |with explicit copy
| |constructor
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34824
