------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-20 08:23 -------
Subject: Bug 34784

Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 20 08:22:56 2008
New Revision: 131675

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131675
Log:
2008-01-20  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR fortran/34784
        * array.c (gfc_check_constructor_type): Clear the expression ts
        so that the checking starts from the deepest level of array
        constructor.
        * primary.c (match_varspec): If an unknown type is changed to
        default character and the attempt to match a substring fails,
        change it back to unknown.

        PR fortran/34785
        * trans-array.c (gfc_add_loop_ss_code) : If ss->string_length is
        NULL for an array constructor, use the cl.length expression to
        build it.
        (gfc_conv_array_parameter): Change call to gfc_evaluate_now to
        a tree assignment.


2008-01-20  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR fortran/34784
        * gfortran.dg/array_constructor_20.f90: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/mapping_2.f90: Correct ubound expression for h4.

        PR fortran/34785
        * gfortran.dg/array_constructor_21.f90: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_20.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_21.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/array.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34784

Reply via email to