------- Comment #17 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-20 23:27 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #16 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 23:22 > ------- > I favor blowing away the RD patch. > > Having the LR problem (and probably the LIVE problem too?) always propagate > the > REG_EQ* notes as if they were real uses sounds like a terrible idea to me. > They are not real uses and should not be treated as such. > > > Unless the powers that be need this fixed asap, i want to wait til i get a consensus from the other df maintainers. but i do see blowing it away as a reasonable answer. it is a shame, it actually does provide a good speedup. Kenny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34884
