------- Comment #38 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 05:11 ------- Update: mainline appears to pass fold checking albeit with a few extra timeouts due to length compilation times. However the last fix for fold checking was never backported to the branches. On 4.1/4.2 I still get these extra fold checking errors due to label addresses:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20021108-1.c FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/920501-7.c FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-1.c FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c FAIL: gcc.dg/20021029-1.c FAIL: gcc.dg/pr16973.c Here are the latest results for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: 4.1 (extra errors): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01221.html 4.2 (extra errors): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01222.html trunk (x86_64 ok): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01253.html I don't have access to solaris any more to see if there are still gomp fold checking failures as from comment #37. -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail|4.0.4 4.1.2 |4.0.4 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.2.2 | |4.2.3 Known to work| |4.3.0 Last reconfirmed|2007-06-30 02:16:08 |2008-01-26 05:11:37 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623
