------- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-31 16:22 ------- Subject: Re: Documentation for -finline-limit is incorrect
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, ddenisen at altera dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #4 from ddenisen at altera dot com 2008-01-31 16:12 ------- > > @emph{Note:} there may be no value to @option{-finline-limit} that results > > in default behavior. > > That's also not user-friendly. When it is changed, it is not clear what is > "more aggressive" inlining and what is not. > > Why don't you make max-inline-insns-single = 5*n/2 and max-inline-insns-auto = > n/2? This way, we have a default that is consistent with current settings and > setting -finline-limit=180 gives you exactly the default. Actually this would be a change in behavior (the current behavior is at least present since gcc 3.3). We can retain a hint at in which range the default value lies for functions explicitly marked as inline (around 900). Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35042