------- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 08:44 ------- > I'm not sure it is a good idea to change semantics of force_gimple_operand > this late in 4.3 cycle.
It's not really a change of semantics, it only bridges the gap between two functions that are supposed to behave the same, but accidentally don't. Either they both should do SSA renaming, or they both shouldn't, but there is no justification for the current status in my opinion. That being said, there is a more annoying problem with IVOPTS which is now papered over twice, instead of once previously, so I don't mind backing out the change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35136
