------- Comment #3 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2008-02-15
01:04 -------
> At the moment I do not see how one could implement this if WG5 insists that
> this is valid - except of passing a hidden argument.
As I am at a WG5 just right now, I decided to ask. Allowing OPTIONAL,VALUE was
a conscious decision by the Committee (although not necessarily an unanimous
one :-)
--
toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-15 01:04:01
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203
