------- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-02-17 19:56 ------- > I don't remember the details for NOT() other than the simplification > isn't simply because of the internal representation with GMP and > GMP does not have a mpz_not function. So, NOT() may accidentally get > the expected answer. I'm unfamiliar with the other functions you > mentioned.
I think the basic problem with all the bit-manipulation intrinsics it that they does not make sense outside an unsigned integer model which does not exist in FORTRAN outside this context. The f9* standard should have added unsigned integer along with the bit manipulations, this would have avoided their embarrassment between 13.3 and 13.4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35223
