------- Comment #45 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-02-22
15:11 -------
I believe the code that assigns the function names in fortran is....
#define DO_DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN(code, name, argtype, tbase) \
gfc_define_builtin ("__builtin_" name "l", tbase##longdouble[argtype], \
BUILT_IN_ ## code ## L, name "l", true); \
gfc_define_builtin ("__builtin_" name, tbase##double[argtype], \
BUILT_IN_ ## code, name, true); \
gfc_define_builtin ("__builtin_" name "f", tbase##float[argtype], \
BUILT_IN_ ## code ## F, name "f", true);
#define DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN(code, name, argtype) \
DO_DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN (code, name, argtype, mfunc_)
#define DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN_C(code, name, argtype) \
DO_DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN (code, name, argtype, mfunc_) \
DO_DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN (C##code, "c" name, argtype, mfunc_c)
in gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c. The last time looked at Andrews proposed
patch, it setting all of the assembler names in a call to
darwin_patch_builtin but none of these are used by the final
assignment of DO_DEFINE_MATH_BUILTIN() in 95-lang.c. Also it
is possible that Andrew's original patch is regressed relative
to gcc trunk...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-05/msg00499.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-05/msg00501.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-05/msg00505.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-05/msg00511.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25477
