------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 21:26 -------
out.at(at++) = append( count-1, out );
I think the issue here is the order of evaluation of the lhs and the rhs is
unspecified so we are evaluating out.at(at++) first and then append( count -1,
out) which causes us to use the old value which is no longer valid.
So this is not a bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35594
