------- Comment #3 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-03-28 15:48 ------- Subject: Re: wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS
Right, in case you haven't found it yet, the first paragraph of 12.7.3, page 214, says effectively that all of the arguments must be conformable with the TO argument. I was mildly amused that a significant restriction on MVBITS came in the paragraph before the one that explicitly discusses MVBITS. Dick Hendrickson On 28 Mar 2008 15:29:05 -0000, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-28 15:29 > ------- > For the second test in comment #1, ifort gives: > > fortcom: Error: pr35681_2.f90, line 2: The shapes of the arguments do not > conform. [MVBITS] > > call mvbits ((ILA1((/9/))), 2, 4, ILA1, 3) > ------------------------------------^ > > > -- > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35681 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35681
