------- Comment #6 from yuriry at gmail dot com 2008-03-31 20:01 ------- Yes, it is legal, sorry confusion. Yuri
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I believe that the main problem here is that GCC allows defining pure > > virtual > > functions. > > No, that's perfectly legal. > W. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33878
