------- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-04-09 08:08 ------- Subject: Re: time/memory hog for large c++ source.
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, pluto at agmk dot net wrote: > ------- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2008-04-08 16:50 ------- > (In reply to comment #6) > > We'll not be able to fix this for 4.3 (the regression is caused by a > > correctness > > fix), but 4.4 will have this param setting as default. > > Can i safely set this parameter to zero for vendor gcc package? > Does the non-zero value fix some bugs or sth? In principle you can set it to zero, but you will lose optimization opportunities in the areas of PRE/FRE, loop invariant and store motion (to name the probably most important ones). Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858
