------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-18 21:02 ------- (In reply to comment #4)
> > Please note off-by one in the last index. > Uros, Indeed:) I'm snooping round trying to understand why the scalarizer has taken to doing that. Not only is the offset wrong, but the size of the temporary array is one more than needed. *sigh* Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35946
