------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 17:11 ------- > Which leads me to think we should probably implement this (for the case that > the interface is explicit). Or is there any good reason that this is not done?
Well, regarding the reason: Before interfaces had no EXTERNAL attribute and those procedures with EXTERNAL attribute had no explicit interface. That interfaces have the EXTERNAL attribute only needed for procedure pointers. One could think of not giving the EXTERNAL attribute to procedures declared in interface bodies and modifying POINTER / the pointer resolution only. I'm not sure what is cleaner and simpler. Regarding our questions, Richard Maine (mostly) answered them. See URL in comment #3. conf2(external,dimension) is in any case wrong. It should be: conflict(external with implicit interface, dimension) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36325
