------- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net  2008-06-11 20:50 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Hm, the patch in comment #6 only affects the case where we have a union with
> subvars.  Did you check that just reverting this patch brings us back to
> 580MB and 1min32?

yes, i've checked r135124 and it needs only ~580MB.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36498

Reply via email to