------- Comment #5 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 18:49 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on
sparc: assertion failure in options.c
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:36:20PM -0000, andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-24 18:36
> -------
> I bootstrapped choice 1. No regressions.
>
> I also prefer to save space where possible. So I'd like to avoid choice 3.
>
> Can we also use 255 or 127 as value for DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN?
Just to echo what I said in IRC for bugzilla, right now you can use 255 or 127.
Using 127 is perhaps better in case the default is changed to use signed bytes
in the future, and 127 will work either way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36918
