------- Comment #76 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-08-31 21:31 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
> Is this really a regression? Yes, but it may not have anything to do with your change. Looking through my test results, I see it started failing between 136817 and 136971. At 136817, there were no test failures with undefined symbols, wrong symbol type, etc. static14.C and static20.C started betweea 137850 and 138833. I just did a quick scan through the test logs for issues that looked like they might be related to the current problem. > What unpatched revision did you use as a baseline? Your patch was applied to 139805. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170
