------- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 10:10 ------- (In reply to comment #6) Thanks to you both - I did not look subsequently at this PR. I hit the problem with ENTRY_1.F90, of course and my solution was one and the same. Many thanks for the coup de main and sorry that I missed it.
Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37583
