------- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 19:40 ------- That bootstrapped/regtested, unfortunately the <= in the assert is not right. And when I've changed the <= in the assert to <, pr29581.f90 ICEs, it has AM_NB_INDUCTION_VARS in one particular case set to 2, and AM_LOOP_NEST_NUM's loop_depth is 1, yet the inline is called with loop_depth 3. So I guess I'll leave this to Sebastian or Jan Sjodin who added all this stuff this May.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37686
