------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-07 10:45 ------- Subject: Re: Member variable of empty base optimized (EBO) class appears on wrong offset
Iirc there are some pod vs non pod issues here dealing wit padding and the c++ standard and not even the abi. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 7, 2008, at 2:31 AM, "david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > ------- Comment #3 from david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com > 2008-10-07 09:31 ------- > Ah, no, I wasn't aware of that document. I just thought that gcc was > treating > the Good and Bad cases inconsitently. > > Now, in layman's terms, is the reason for the padding that no two > distinct > instances of Empty may share the same address? If that is the case, > it would > explain the padding and this is not a bug. > > Sorry, should have investigated more before hitting the commit button. > > /David > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37762 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37762
