------- Comment #3 from mikael dot morin at tele2 dot fr 2008-10-17 12:39
-------
I'm at r141174.
But I don't think it is one particular revision.
I have seen this for a couple of weeks now.
I thought it would be reverted soon.
Now, I'm not sure it is a gcc bug.
I have the feeling that my system is somehow broken, but I can't figure out
where.
Here are the details:
$ /usr/local/bin/gfortran -v
Utilisation des specs internes.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configuré avec: ../src/configure --enable-languages=fortran --disable-multilib
Modèle de thread: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 20081016 (experimental) (GCC)
$ /usr/local/bin/gcc -O0 -g -c value_4.c
$ /usr/local/bin/gfortran -ff2c -w -O0 -g value_4.o value_4.f90 -o value_4
$ ./value_4
zsh: segmentation fault ./value_4
(gdb) bt
#0 __muldc3 (a=8, b=0, c=0, d=1) at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1834
#1 0x00007fb8c55fb351 in __muldc3 (a=8, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#2 0x00007fb8c55fb351 in __muldc3 (a=8, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#3 0x00007fb8c55fb351 in __muldc3 (a=8, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#4 0x00007fb8c55fb351 in __muldc3 (a=-1, b=2, c=4, d=0)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#5 0x00000000004007f7 in c_to_c__ (retval=0x7fffce012220, c1=0 + 0 * I,
c2=0x7fffce012228) at value_4.c:48
#6 0x000000000040092d in value_4 () at value_4.f90:39
#7 0x00000000004009e0 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffce012338)
at ../../../src/libgfortran/fmain.c:21
#8 0x00007fb8c52a6146 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#9 0x0000000000400659 in _start ()
this is not fortran-related, reduced-testcase:
#include <complex.h>
int main ()
{
complex float u = __muldc3 (1, 2, 3, 4);
return 0;
}
(gdb) bt
#0 __muldc3 (a=10, b=0, c=0, d=1) at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1834
#1 0x0000000000400cc1 in __muldc3 (a=10, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#2 0x0000000000400cc1 in __muldc3 (a=10, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#3 0x0000000000400cc1 in __muldc3 (a=10, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#4 0x0000000000400cc1 in __muldc3 (a=10, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#5 0x0000000000400cc1 in __muldc3 (a=10, b=0, c=0, d=1)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#6 0x0000000000400cc1 in __muldc3 (a=1, b=2, c=3, d=4)
at ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1889
#7 0x00000000004004a1 in main () at value_4_f90.c:4
I looked at the offending line, but seen nothing wrong though I have never
been playing with C complex.
In fact the code looks like directly taken from the C99 standard, so I bet it's
correct.
I will see if I can find a working revision.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37850
