------- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 13:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=16588)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16588&action=view)
Add POINTER_PLUS_EXPR - Improvement?
It seems we miss the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR. In most cases in tree-scalar-evol.c and
tree-chrec.c it is handled like a PLUS_EXPR. If I add it, the test case passes
the front end, but fails again in gloog() with:
#0 0x089d919f in link_imm_use (linknode=0x29072c4c, def=0x20017) at
tree-flow-inline.h:323
#1 0x089d914e in set_ssa_use_from_ptr (use=0x29072c4c, val=0x20017) at
tree-flow-inline.h:342
#2 0x089d9097 in graphite_rename_variables_in_stmt (stmt=0x29060528,
map=0x8d8b040)
at ../../../git/gcc/graphite.c:3512
#3 0x089d9b89 in graphite_rename_variables (bb=0x29060618, map=0x8d8b040)
at ../../../git/gcc/graphite.c:3685
#4 0x089da177 in translate_clast (scop=0x8d321c0, context_loop=0x29100948,
stmt=0x8d8a350,
next_e=0x290c2988, ivstack=0xbfbfe880) at ../../../git/gcc/graphite.c:3816
#5 0x089d9fbd in translate_clast (scop=0x8d321c0, context_loop=0x29100948,
stmt=0x8d8a110,
next_e=0x290c25c8, ivstack=0xbfbfe880) at ../../../git/gcc/graphite.c:3781
I will have to think about the patch. Opinions?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37883
