------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 12:39 -------
The include_next doesn't make any sense in the cXXX headers, include_next is
typically used when including the same header name, not when you are including
unrelated header name, exactly because making assumptions whether it comes
earlier or later in the search path is bad.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38000
