------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 11:16 ------- Mikael,
(In reply to comment #4) > Maybe we can drop gfc_conv_section_upper_bound completely. > It looks redundant with how info->end[n] is calculated in > gfc_conv_section_startstride. > I tried that and generated a load of regressions. I didn't analyse this but stuck with the patch as is. I maybe will think about it some more but I am inclined to put a TODO in there. Thanks Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38033
