------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-17 22:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=16713)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16713&action=view)
gcc44-pr38130.patch
I've talked about this with Honza on IRC:
<honza> I would just use "0" constraint. At least in old times with regmove,
regmove was able to discover that it should use same pseudo for input and
output. If you use pair of "=a" and "a" only reload sees this fact
<honza> so patch is OK with that change.
This is an updated patch which uses "0" instead of "a" constraint for operand
1.
So, can anyone please test it? Thanks.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #16712|0 |1
is obsolete| |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38130
