------- Comment #6 from billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-04 03:04 
-------
Just had a look at this with cvs gfortran under cygwin.

A slightly modified test

program intrinsic_integer
  implicit none

  call test (0.0, (/0, 0, 0, 0/))
  call test (0.3, (/0, 1, 0, 0/))
  call test (0.7, (/0, 1, 0, 1/))
  call test (-0.3, (/-1, 0, 0, 0/))
  call test (-0.7, (/-1, 0, 0, -1/))
contains
subroutine test(val, res)
  real :: val
  integer, dimension(4) :: res

  if ((floor(val) .ne. res(1)) .or. (ceiling(val) .ne. res(2)) &
      .or. (int(val) .ne. res(3)) .or. (nint(val) .ne. res(4))) then
     write(6,'(a,f4.1,a,i2,a,i2)') 'nint(', val, ')=', nint(val), &
       ' require ', res(4)
  end if
end subroutine
end program

at -O0, -O1,  -O2 and -O3 gives

nint( 0.7)= 0 require  1                                                      
nint(-0.7)= 0 require -1

The C test program at #1, compiled with gcc-3.4.4 or CVS gcc 4.4.0 20081128
(experimental) [trunk revision 142255] gives "0 1 1" as expected.



-- 

billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |billingd at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33595

Reply via email to