------- Comment #6 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 17:35 ------- Subject: Re: TreeSSA-PRE load after store misoptimization
Yes, i'm aware, but again, that is because my recollection is doing partial antic partial avail with lifetime optimality requires code placement that we don't do. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:27 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 17:27 > ------- > by_all was there because you made it so on purpose. From tree-ssa-pre.c: > > " For the partial anticipation case, we only perform insertion if it > is partially anticipated in some block, and fully available in all > of the predecessors. > " > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38401 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38401
